Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2011/06/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] 35mm Summicron R lens - good , bad, so so?
From: hlritter at bex.net (Howard Ritter)
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:35:25 -0400
References: <BLU0-SMTP83B191AFFD2D90C0C7D4538C510@phx.gbl> <BANLkTi=EoiqzfkDUCFVrZ_isTkB4uQ3OrQ@mail.gmail.com> <A2AFBB2B-3DE8-414A-BF9A-D0EC7FA25720@bex.net> <BLU0-SMTP3314F39F1B89E346B496308C510@phx.gbl>
Well, I certainly wouldn't want to think those poor craftsmen had to work in
the blazing sun!
?howard
On Jun 21, 2011, at 8:22 AM, Vick Ko wrote:
>
>
> Mandler version = Ver II, designed in Midland, made in Wetzlar, from1977.
> Built in shade.
>
> Vick
In reply to:
Message from vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko) ([Leica] 35mm Summicron R lens - good , bad, so so?)
Message from benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] 35mm Summicron R lens - good , bad, so so?)
Message from hlritter at bex.net (Howard Ritter) ([Leica] 35mm Summicron R lens - good , bad, so so?)
Message from vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko) ([Leica] 35mm Summicron R lens - good , bad, so so?)