Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/06/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thanks Marty. I sold my 35/1.4 R, partially due to it being too heavy. I'm thinking of getting a 35/2 R. Or maybe only reserving my 35mm focal length shooting to M camera. But I would like a small R lens to use on my R9. I only have superwides and tele's for it. regards Vick On 6/21/2011 8:01 AM, Marty Deveney wrote: > I just played with some 35mm R lenses recently. The Mandler version > of the lens is really great. It's very flare resistant with light > sources in the frame, has excellent colour reproduction and few > serious flaws. It occasionally flares when there are diffuse, bright > sources of light outside the frame, much like the 50/2 Summicron-M > six-element versions. With an SLR you can usually see the flare > before you shoot. The Summilux-R is better until about f2.8-4, where > they become equal, and has better close up and near-far performance > because of its floating element. But the Summilux has more optical > vignetting, and has a 67mm filter thread, and is much heavier, instead > of 55 for the Summicron. > > Marty