Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2011/04/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] OT: Technical Question- Panning vs WA Lens
From: rgacpa at yahoo.com (Bob Adler)
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 06:22:25 -0700 (PDT)
References: <687547.86382.qm@web82108.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <009d01cbfe02$963b4ed0$c2b1ec70$@earthlink.net> <p06230903c9d28a67d846@[10.0.1.4]> <182666.74713.qm@web82104.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <a5db223b6125e581cdff3f0fc776ed01.squirrel@emailmg.globat.com>
Monster. 40CFi/FLE
The CFE/FLE is even more recent I think, Alastair. You must have an earlier
version without the FLE? CF T*?
Best,
Bob
Bob Adler
Palo Alto, CA
http://www.rgaphoto.com
________________________________
From: "afirkin at afirkin.com" <afirkin at afirkin.com>
To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
Sent: Tue, April 19, 2011 3:20:47 AM
Subject: Re: [Leica] OT: Technical Question- Panning vs WA Lens
Bob, I have a fairly light 40mm for the blad: CFE lens I think. Is yours
the 'monster' one? This 40 is smaller than my 50 f2.8
Cheers
Replies:
Reply from afirkin at afirkin.com (afirkin at afirkin.com) ([Leica] OT: Technical Question- Panning vs WA Lens)
In reply to:
Message from rgacpa at yahoo.com (Bob Adler) ([Leica] OT: Technical Question- Panning vs WA Lens)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Red735i) ([Leica] OT: Technical Question- Panning vs WA Lens)
Message from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] OT: Technical Question- Panning vs WA Lens)
Message from rgacpa at yahoo.com (Bob Adler) ([Leica] OT: Technical Question- Panning vs WA Lens)
Message from afirkin at afirkin.com (afirkin at afirkin.com) ([Leica] OT: Technical Question- Panning vs WA Lens)