Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/04/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] OT: Technical Question- Panning vs WA Lens
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 15:25:13 -0500
References: <687547.86382.qm@web82108.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <9DC793B4-A06C-44D1-A4AB-3B5B5A11F4CF@mac.com> <379073.13570.qm@web82107.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
 
On Apr 18, 2011, at 3:18 PM, Bob Adler wrote:

> OK. Proof in the pudding.
> I'm still trying to figure out what to carry long distances. I'm a WA 
> shooter; 
> love the near far perspective. Great foreground leading to an even greater 
> far 
> background.
> But the 40 is 3x heavier than the 80. Guess I just want it all.


You may find the size/weight difference will equalize
with the nodal point panning hardware required for the 80.

;~(

Regards,
George Lottermoser 
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
Replies: Reply from rgacpa at yahoo.com (Bob Adler) ([Leica] OT: Technical Question- Panning vs WA Lens)
 In reply to: Message from rgacpa at yahoo.com (Bob Adler) ([Leica] OT: Technical Question- Panning vs WA Lens)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] OT: Technical Question- Panning vs WA Lens)
Message from rgacpa at yahoo.com (Bob Adler) ([Leica] OT: Technical Question- Panning vs WA Lens)