Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/01/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]The flange distances being what they are this is what it should have to be. As Richard writes. As you can not have a negative adaptor. The adaptor itself has to exist. The simplicity and elegance of an Evil Or DEVIL or MILC camera would be too hard to say no too. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mirrorless_interchangeable_lens_camer Its an obvious solution to an archaic lens mount which could not be discounted by a Leica persons with PR capabilities talking to a group of people with that glass sitting at home. If Leica could not crank one of these puppies out I'm sure Panasonic could do it for them. When they started using the term "solution" the didn't say "camera" as in R10. Its a solution probably not a perfect perfect one to getting the glass going again. Both the Leitax adaptors on a Nikon and these would be more than adequate; quite inspiring in use. -------------------- Mark William Rabiner Photography http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/ mark at rabinergroup.com Cars: http://tinyurl.com/2f7ptxb > From: "Richard S. Taylor" <r.s.taylor at comcast.net> > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 14:30:34 -0500 > To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Subject: Re: [Leica] Hullo. Leice R Solution > > Actually, I was there, and the way it was discussed was as a full-frame > EVIL > camera directed primarily towards M-lens use with an adapter allowing R > lenses > to be used. > > Regards, > > Dick