Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/01/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Image criteria - a Luddite view NOW- "THE VIEW!"
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2011 17:16:31 -0600
References: <AANLkTi=jTDTcx=JhLRE3_zCqQCxDkwBZZa80K8Zn2QVw@mail.gmail.com> <D2AE48FD-8EAD-44AB-B0CB-2C8AA12E0D3A@mac.com> <BF0D16CC665444219F822A564EFF2EB7@syneticfeba505>
 
No dispute from me.
Photography = light sensitive emulsions and sensors.
ergo LIGHT = PHOTOGRAPHY

Additionally though
as Geoff pointed out
the responses do say a lot
about the thinking and working methods
of the responders.

Regards,
George Lottermoser 
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist





On Jan 3, 2011, at 4:06 PM, tedgrant at shaw.ca wrote:

> There  really wasn't and still isn't any kind of rule of thumb;  first, 
> second or third system to follow other than the LIGHT!  And regardles of 
> what anyone says... "LIGHT IS THE MOST IMPORTANT ELEMENT IN MAKING 
> PICTURES MAGICAL!" Oh I don't doubt for one mili-second there will be a 
> bunch of retorts! But do you know what? I don't give a flying hoop what 
> anyone says because I have 60 years plus of professional assigned & 
> published photography behind me to back it up!
Replies: Reply from ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] Image criteria - a Luddite view NOW- "THE VIEW!")
 In reply to: Message from lrzeitlin at gmail.com (Lawrence Zeitlin) ([Leica] Image criteria - a Luddite view)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Image criteria - a Luddite view)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca) ([Leica] Image criteria - a Luddite view NOW- "THE VIEW!")