Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/12/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] IMG: Friday's flowers
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 11:39:37 -0600
References: <CACA389B-85F4-47AD-8934-67C40424727E@mac.com> <2D0B9CDC842B435F81ACDCEF97B02D70@jimnichols>
 
Thanks for weighing in Jim.

I tend to agree.

Regards,
George Lottermoser 
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist





On Dec 3, 2010, at 10:53 AM, Jim Nichols wrote:

> I find the second one definitely better.
> 
> Jim Nichols
> Tullahoma, TN USA
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "George Lottermoser" <imagist3 at 
> mac.com>
> To: "Group Users Leica" <lug at leica-users.org>
> Cc: "LRF reflex" <leicareflex at freelists.org>
> Sent: Friday, December 03, 2010 8:30 AM
> Subject: [Leica] IMG: Friday's flowers
> 
> 
>> <http://www.imagist.com/blog/?p=4479>
In reply to: Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] IMG: Friday's flowers)
Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] IMG: Friday's flowers)