Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2010/11/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] "Proper" portrait lens.
From: sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter)
Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2010 21:06:50 -0600
References: <AANLkTinGp9HbvBvkt-2VnU6+C8seHjhT3TwhAeHaDL+V@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTimpqzK44j9ej_LGaRqmD6AKxCKmEzSdfwXnTyS8@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTindH+X_nuBads12PtzM5BjOAU2L47-EA8OZCjvj@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 9:01 PM, Jayanand Govindaraj <jayanand at
gmail.com>wrote:
> Isn't a digital CL called an X1?
>
Not even close.
small sensor
no vf.
fixed lens
ugly
Have you ever used a CL?
Regards,
Sonny
http://sonc.com/look/
Natchitoches, Louisiana
USA
Replies:
Reply from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] "Proper" portrait lens.)
In reply to:
Message from lrzeitlin at gmail.com (Lawrence Zeitlin) ([Leica] "Proper" portrait lens.)
Message from digiratidoc at gmail.com (James Laird) ([Leica] "Proper" portrait lens.)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] "Proper" portrait lens.)