Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/08/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I read further and found that when they get an image not from a camera on the good list they simply look at it a bit more carefully. So the Camera good and bad list's are perhaps a general guide. A helpful nudge in the right direction. As in "don't use your credit card camera and think you're going to send us that stuff". -------------------- Mark William Rabiner Photography mark at rabinergroup.com > From: Tina Manley <images at comporium.net> > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2010 16:38:35 -0400 > To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Subject: Re: [Leica] Compact cameras > > However, in my experience, Quality Control at Alamy is a lot more strict > than Getty. It didn't used to be but they have tightened up lately and > it's > very hard to get anything through that is not absolutely perfect. They > will > routinely fail almost anything that has been interpolated. Getty seems to > judge more on content and less on technical quality. Just because a > camera > is listed as acceptable by Alamy does not mean the photo will pass. > > Tina