Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/12/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]As I said in an earlier post on this subject I value the first impression as much as the next person. Nor am I lobbying for in-depth critiques. We each offer what we can, as we can. I certainly could not afford the time to consider every image post in the manner that I considered Doug's wildlife photography. Those thoughts evolved over years of looking at Doug's work; and reading what he's had to say about his own and other's work. And that only because Doug invited it. Which is the main point I think worth making. If you want more in the way of useful criticism inform us as to your intentions, methods, techniques, concerns (as Doug has clearly done over time); and invite deeper critiques with some specificity. I'm simply thinking about all this because someone asked for more "harsh." ;~) Regards, George Lottermoser george at imagist.com http://www.imagist.com http://www.imagist.com/blog http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist On Dec 17, 2009, at 9:19 PM, Jayanand Govindaraj wrote: > I know immediately whether I > like a photograph or not, and that is good enough for me.