Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2009/12/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Noctiux - 0.95 vs 1.0
From: gregj_lorenzo at hotmail.com (Greg Lorenzo)
Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 19:35:10 -0700
References: <348513.98692.qm@web82103.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <003601ca7601$59c1d300$0d457900$@net>, <BLU0-SMTP47AA61E1192E61F4AC7A308C910@phx.gbl>, <4B1B0C61.8080207@comporium.net>
Tina Manley writes:
> The 1.0 results looked better than the .95 in all of them, to me. I'm
> perfectly happy sticking with my 1.0.
Exactly what I was thinking as I looked at the images.
Greg Lorenzo
Calgary, Canada
_________________________________________________________________
Chat with Messenger straight from your Hotmail inbox.
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowslive/hotmail_bl1/hotmail_bl1.aspx?ocid=PID23879::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-ww:WM_IMHM_4:092009
Replies:
Reply from benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] Noctiux - 0.95 vs 1.0)
In reply to:
Message from rgacpa at yahoo.com (Bob Adler) ([Leica] Noctiux - 0.95 vs 1.0)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Noctiux - 0.95 vs 1.0)
Message from vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko) ([Leica] Noctiux - 0.95 vs 1.0)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Noctiux - 0.95 vs 1.0)