Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2009/10/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Easy decisions for M9 or not
From: images at comporium.net (Tina Manley)
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 06:24:59 -0400
References: <C7016E5D.56BDB%mark@rabinergroup.com> <p06230900c701d06bc4b7@[10.1.16.129]> <4ADCC9AB.6040204@comporium.net> <015e01ca5114$b44de500$1ce9af00$@net> <4ADD0429.8040708@comporium.net> <E714C65E-65D3-4C46-86CF-2AC262356A08@gmail.com>
so this takes the place of..."whether it's a good photo?" & "whether
it has anything to say?"
>
>
> Steve
Absolutely! They don't edit for content any more, only quality.
Nobody knows what buyers are looking for these days. Anything could
sell if it is big enough and sharp enough. Every month I sell photos of
grocery store shelves.
Tina
www.tinamanley.com
In reply to:
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Easy decisions for M9 or not)
Message from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] Easy decisions for M9 or not)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Easy decisions for M9 or not)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Easy decisions for M9 or not)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Easy decisions for M9 or not)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Easy decisions for M9 or not)