Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/10/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Easy decisions for M9 or not
From: red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone)
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 21:36:13 -0700
References: <C7016E5D.56BDB%mark@rabinergroup.com> <p06230900c701d06bc4b7@[10.1.16.129]> <4ADCC9AB.6040204@comporium.net> <015e01ca5114$b44de500$1ce9af00$@net> <4ADD0429.8040708@comporium.net> <016201ca513c$b803b9e0$280b2da0$@net> <92D5A478-3BEB-494C-B0C5-714FDDE9A8FF@gmail.com>
 
Sounds a lot like protecting Union Turf...... 

Any 2 bit rich guy can get a $8K camera, put a $8K lens in front and still
make lousy pictures.......  technically lousy or content lousy.......

What camera produces native files of 48MB?  A Hasselblad?  LF stuff?

I don't think the word idiocy truly captures the (lack of) thought
process.....

Frank Filippone
red735i at earthlink.net



but what kind of game are they playing?
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Easy decisions for M9 or not)
Message from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] Easy decisions for M9 or not)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Easy decisions for M9 or not)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Easy decisions for M9 or not)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Easy decisions for M9 or not)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Easy decisions for M9 or not)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Easy decisions for M9 or not)