Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/09/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Vick wrote: 2009/9/14 Vick Ko <vick.ko at sympatico.ca> See the video about the M9 at Solms? http://www.luminous-landscape.com/videos/m9-video.shtml - - - - - - The video of the M9 assembly may explain some of the reliability and malfunction problems associated with the M8 when it was introduced. Assembly seems to be mostly a hands on process carried out by skilled personnel. Production engineers have long known that even trained product assemblers have an error rate of approximately .001. It doesn't matter whether they are German, Japanese, or even Mexican. Assuming that there are at least 100 critical manual operations in assembling, adjusting and inspecting an M8 or M9, an estimated overall bad camera rate might be .1. If Leica sold 5000 M8 cameras, 500 might be unsatisfactory and would have to be returned for repairs. For most consumer products, manufacturers simply compensate for the return rate by slightly inflating their costs to cover the price of replacement products. It is often cheaper than elaborate quality control and investment in special purpose automated production equipment. Leica does not make enough cameras to justify an automated production line so they should substitite extensive testing of each unit. Unfortunately, as has been elaborated in the LUG, the Leica consumer is the testing department. "Don't be the first by whom the new is tried, or last to cast the old aside." Wait until the M9.1. Larry Z