Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2009/09/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] leica x1 @ popflash
From: henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff)
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 13:46:35 -0700
References: <440b792d0909082124o52a31b6p45706fbac43662b8@mail.gmail.com> <7ac27f4f0909082151h6e77f0b1wf0202ba128d0ce36@mail.gmail.com> <3A125937-39C6-4370-8D96-FC3F9F8CFA09@btinternet.com> <4AA80D4B.9070102@hale-pohaku.net> <7ac27f4f0909091333r2ee4f5jf3558c8a7225a3d5@mail.gmail.com>
At 1:33 PM -0700 9/9/09, Richard Man wrote:
>IF it has much faster write time, then why would anyone else wants a
>Sigma DP-1, DP-2 etc.?
>
>
1/2 the price? Foveon quality?
I tried the DP-1 for a bit; in my personal opinion an almost
unuseable camera, but still, some people like it. The DP-2 is better,
but not enough.
On the other hand, if you have Leica lenses, why would you want an
X-1? Used M8 prices are pretty close to X-1 prices, and while the X-1
has autofocus, I doubt that it has as little lag as the M8.
--
* Henning J. Wulff
/|\ Wulff Photography & Design
/###\ mailto:henningw at archiphoto.com
|[ ]| http://www.archiphoto.com
Replies:
Reply from h_arche at yahoo.com (H. Ball Arche) ([Leica] X1 might be ok)
Reply from h_arche at yahoo.com (H. Ball Arche) ([Leica] Fw: X1 might be ok)
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Leica x1 @ PopFlash)
In reply to:
Message from msadat at gmail.com (mehrdad) ([Leica] leica x1 @ popflash)
Message from richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] leica x1 @ popflash)
Message from Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie) ([Leica] leica x1 @ popflash)
Message from dennis at hale-pohaku.net (Dennis) ([Leica] leica x1 @ popflash)
Message from richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] leica x1 @ popflash)