Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2009/06/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] IMG: Berlin - some modern and inhuman architecture
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 18:18:06 -0500
References: <4A329771.9070905@gmx.de> <3834BF11-21ED-4996-AB2C-F8090841F63C@mac.com> <4A36D58C.3010404@gmx.de>
And that partiality comes through in your photographs.
The photographs are strong
because your feelings about the subject are strong.
The "ball" is otherworldly
feels like a 30 or 40's sci-fi movie set
Regards,
George Lottermoser
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
On Jun 15, 2009, at 6:13 PM, Douglas Sharp wrote:
> I must admit that I am rather partial to modern architecture, no
> matter how inhuman, especially in combination with very wide angle
> lenses.
Replies:
Reply from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] IMG: Berlin - some modern and inhuman architecture)
In reply to:
Message from douglas.sharp at gmx.de (Douglas Sharp) ([Leica] IMG: Berlin - some modern and inhuman architecture)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] IMG: Berlin - some modern and inhuman architecture)
Message from douglas.sharp at gmx.de (Douglas Sharp) ([Leica] IMG: Berlin - some modern and inhuman architecture)