[Leica] OT: D3x vs. 'Blad CFV 16MP full sized samples

[imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)]

and i would theorize
that the more AA applied
the more sharpening needed
the less "real" fine detail
and the more "invented" fine detail.

therefore
less 3 dimensionality
less illusion of surface and substance
more digital (digitized) appearance.

i understand the subjective nature of what i'm saying
i'm do not intend to "argue" the point.

simply discussing a quest for a "look" and "feel" in the prints

Regards,
George Lottermoser
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist

On May 31, 2009, at 9:37 PM, Thein Onn Ming wrote:

> But it is a good illustration of how much inherently sharper a non- 
> AA camera (the M8) is than the best of the AA cameras (arguably,  
> the D3) straight out of the box with sharpening set to zero in ACR  
> defaults.