Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/05/31

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] OT: D3x vs. 'Blad CFV 16MP full sized samples
From: images at comporium.net (Tina Manley)
Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 11:57:07 -0400
References: <200905301516.BPV96835@rg4.comporium.net> <C6472CE9.4F398%mark@rabinergroup.com>
 
At 06:35 PM 5/30/2009, you wrote:
>Software sharpening is simply NOT AN OPTIONAL PART of the traditional
>digital workflow. You don't go "gee I sharpened this one!"
>You leave it out you just don't have a picture.
>It cuts all the phlegm away showing what's underneath.
>
>Mark William Rabiner

Except that most stock agencies allow absolutely no sharpening of any 
kind.  There is no telling what the final usage of the photo will be 
so any sharpening is supposed to be left up to the buyer.  I had many 
Canon files rejected for being "soft and lacking detail".  I've never 
had an M8 file rejected for any reason.

Tina

Tina Manley
www.tinamanley.com
Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] OT: D3x vs. 'Blad CFV 16MP full sized samples)
Reply from mingthein at gmail.com (Thein Onn Ming) ([Leica] OT: D3x vs. 'Blad CFV 16MP full sized samples)
 In reply to: Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] OT: D3x vs 'Blad CFV 16MP full sized samples)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] OT: D3x vs. 'Blad CFV 16MP full sized samples)