Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/05/31

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] OT: D3x vs. 'Blad CFV 16MP full sized samples
From: wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (Doug Herr)
Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 05:28:46 -0700 (GMT-07:00)

Mark Rabiner wrote:

>I can't imagine that a drum scan of a 24 x 36mm slow speed ISO neg shot with
>Leica glass shot on a tripod would not have a whole lot of information in
>it.
>
>Pit against a KAF-10500 sensor with an active area of 27 x 18 mm which you
>find in an M8 I'm not sure I'd root for the sensor in the camera.
>
>I'm not a betting man normally but I'm afraid I'd put 2 bucks down on the
>drum.

There's no substitute for making an actual comparison.

Doug Herr
Birdman of Sacramento
http://www.wildlightphoto.com




Replies: Reply from mingthein at gmail.com (Thein Onn Ming) ([Leica] OT: D3x vs. 'Blad CFV 16MP full sized samples)