Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/05/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] OT: D3x vs. 'Blad CFV 16MP full sized samples
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 16:19:27 -0400
 
I'll second that.
Especially the part about the prints.


Mark William Rabiner



> From: George Lottermoser <imagist3 at mac.com>
> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 19:19:44 -0500
> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] OT: D3x vs 'Blad CFV 16MP full sized samples
> 
> certainly a nice sample
> but also a tad artifacty
> 
> the only way to really make this kind of judgement
> is to look at the actual raw files and large prints.
> 
> also
> Ming is shooting with M8 and knows how the files appear
In reply to: Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] OT: D3x vs 'Blad CFV 16MP full sized samples)