Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2008/09/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: screaming children meet john
From: ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter)
Date: Tue Sep 16 16:11:09 2008
References: <40FA2CEF-4194-44C7-A595-5CCA9B8AB469@mac.com> <002c01c91849$3ab96e80$80f510ac@chris0436b6050> <C40DB02D-17FA-48C2-8B84-649ADA37A5A4@embarqmail.com> <200809162247.BAH09780@rg5.comporium.net>
My question is NOT about Greenberg, whose stuff I do not care for.
My question is about who REALLY thinks portraiture is about neutrality?
ric
On Sep 16, 2008, at 6:47 PM, Tina Manley wrote:
> Jill Greenberg deliberately used unflattering lighting and editing,
> even adding a monkey to a photo, to portray McCain in a biased way.
> If she wants to do that for "art", that's her prerogative, but it
> has no place on the cover of the Atlantic Monthly unless they are
> covering her art exhibit. It's certainly not photojournalism.
Replies:
Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] Re: screaming children meet john)
In reply to:
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] screaming children meet john)
Message from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Chris Williams) ([Leica] Re: screaming children meet john)
Message from ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] Re: screaming children meet john)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Re: screaming children meet john)