Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/04/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] In defence of the newspapers
From: amr3 at uwm.edu (amr3@uwm.edu)
Date: Fri Apr 11 10:31:06 2008
References: <200804101402.m3AE1cq2061057@server1.waverley.reid.org>

Quoting  Nathan Wajsman <nathan@nathanfoto.com>

> At the same time, we should not
> forget that traditional broadsheet newspapers were never the bastions
> of great photography in the vein of Life magazine etc. They were
> printed on cheap paper, your hands got black from reading them, and
> the reproduction quality of the images was pretty bad. Let's face it,
> in a daily newspaper photography is secondary to the words.
......................................................................................................................................
This is probably true many places, but in Milwaukee (and Wisconsin in 
general)
the tradition continues of good newspaper photos. The Milwaukee Journal was
training ground for many photographers who went on the National Geographic,
LIFE, The Smithsonian, etc.

In the glory days, the photo department was under the PRODUCTION area, not
editorial, so whatever benefited how well the high-quality photos appeared 
was
pursued.  Thus the Journal led in the use of multi-flash for separation of
tones on newsprint, as well as the change to 35mm for more flexible coverage.

Alan

Alan Magayne-Roshak, Senior Photographer
University Information Technology Services
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
amr3@uwm.edu
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Alan+Magayne-Roshak/


Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] In defense of the newspapers)