Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2008/02/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: Erwin telling it like it may be
From: leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams)
Date: Wed Feb 27 15:55:29 2008
References: <541F0D48-41FF-4D3B-80FA-755AE07D2045@mac.com><018701c87991$4c6586c0$0302a8c0@MacPhisto> <795A31CE-0980-4CE8-84CC-AE03D7DFAD96@cox.net><01c301c87996$fcf52a40$0302a8c0@MacPhisto> <47C5F457.4010603@mcclary.net>
The L1 started at $1999.00, then went to $1499.00, then to $1199.00. During
that time Leica announced some kind of rebate for the
Digilux 3. I got to use an L1 one time, it's worth $1199 for lens+camera,
but not $2500.
Chris
----- Original Message -----
From: "Harrison McClary"
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Erwin telling it like it may be
> Christopher Williams wrote:
>> Aslo don't charge $2500 for a 4/3 system camera just because it's
>> rebranded with a Red Dot?
>>
>> Chris
>
>
> LOL...I wonder how many buy the re branded Panasonic then COVER the red
> dot up with tape....
>
> --
> Harrison McClary
In reply to:
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] Erwin telling it like it may be)
Message from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams) ([Leica] Re: Erwin telling it like it may be)
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Re: Erwin telling it like it may be)
Message from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams) ([Leica] Re: Erwin telling it like it may be)
Message from lists at mcclary.net (Harrison McClary) ([Leica] Re: Erwin telling it like it may be)