Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/02/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] re: does process matter
From: imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George)
Date: Mon Feb 11 07:24:42 2008
References: <ce17f770437ae9c9739107144687adbf@cshore.com>

Not too many print buyers, print makers, print collectors would  
consider a silver print made from a negative "one of a kind."
Certainly not in the way that a Polaroid print or other one-off photo  
products would be.
Mono prints generally indicate that the "plate" is destroyed in the  
making of the print.
As long as the original "plate," negative, stone, block, etc. exists  
- the prints are rarely considered one of a kind. They may be  
considered slightly unique variations for one reason or another  
(different paper, different dodging and burning) but the same is true  
for ink jet prints. I make variations with the computer and ink jet  
printer all the time.

On Feb 9, 2008, at 8:03 PM, Douglas Nygren wrote:

> The silver in a traditional black and white print is in the paper.  
> it is also one of a kind.

Fond regards,
George
george@imagist.com
www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
Picture A Week - www.imagist.com/paw_07




Replies: Reply from ricc at mindspring.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] re: does process matter)
In reply to: Message from dnygr at cshore.com (Douglas Nygren) ([Leica] re: does process matter)