Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2007/12/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Some more 'cutting the edge'
From: imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George)
Date: Sat Dec 8 09:19:38 2007
References: <C7662BC1-A7C7-40D5-BD2B-5FFE1D1FE575@pandora.be> <DAE481B0-645D-4EC1-BC34-E2A272CA4083@mac.com> <6AB0AFE1-B2B6-4169-B6D4-432F3C273C5C@mac.com> <F8763E34-798D-4933-AF30-000F155A6CA4@pandora.be> <EF82AB17-AD66-428D-9C59-991D012E2EFA@mac.com> <C922A174-8E4E-48B3-AA3D-D2005DDF27DA@pandora.be>
While I appreciate all those periods and styles, some more than
others, I'm speaking only of my own personal taste for simplicity
directness. Understanding how each period (style) leads to the next,
and how they intertwine with one another to inspire the yet uncharted
makes this discussion rich for a seeker, like myself.
Regards,
George Lottermoser
george@imagist.com
www.imagist.com
Picture A Week - www.imagist.com/paw_07
On Dec 8, 2007, at 11:10 AM, Philippe Orlent wrote:
> Following that principle: no rococo, no art nouveau, art deco, no
> Pollock, no Braque, Matisse, ...
> I love Bauhaus, but Bauhaus was developed for practical purposes.
> Art does not have to be practical.
In reply to:
Message from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] Some more 'cutting the edge')
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] Some more 'cutting the edge')
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] Some more 'cutting the edge')
Message from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] Some more 'cutting the edge')
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] Some more 'cutting the edge')
Message from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] Some more 'cutting the edge')