Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/11/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] 16-16-15 lens comparison
From: jbm at jbm.org (Jeff Moore)
Date: Mon Nov 5 15:03:02 2007
References: <p0623090bc354ea94bde1@[10.1.16.153]> <C354ED73.73CB9%mark@rabinergroup.com>
 
2007-11-05-15:55:31 Mark Rabiner:
> No ones weighed in on how the 14mm 2.8D ED Nikkor is supposed to stand up
> which i've been using. I'm going to check again right now but so far I've
> not found a nay sayers in cyberspace.

Yeah.  At the fredmiranda site (sounds like one of those government loan
programs: Freddie Mar)

  
http://www.fredmiranda.com/reviews/showproduct.php?product=52&sort=4&cat=12&page=1

only four people own up to having one, but not a one of them will say
anything bad.
Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] 16-16-15 lens comparison)
 In reply to: Message from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] 16-16-15 lens comparison)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] 16-16-15 lens comparison)