Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/05/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Too Many for PAW 19
From: ricc at (Ric Carter)
Date: Wed May 16 18:37:15 2007
References: <> <000601c79820$713cbd90$6501a8c0@asus930>

Not quite, actually. That one was shot last week;^) She is a lovely  
thing though.

The 1982 ones are labeled WayBack. Maybe I should break these suckers  
into two albums. I was never quite sure how best to do that.

Thanks for the peek.


On May 16, 2007, at 9:12 PM, G Hopkinson wrote:

> The first one from 1982, actually encapsulates one really  
> significant aspect of photography for me.
> It's a nice casual portrait and not dated, I think. But that lady's  
> baby bump ought now be old enough to be out accomplishing who
> knows what in the world. A genuine frozen sliver of time. That's  
> the way looking at older media always strikes me anyway.

Replies: Reply from hoppyman at (G Hopkinson) ([Leica] Too Many for PAW 19)
In reply to: Message from ricc at (Ric Carter) ([Leica] Too Many for PAW 19)
Message from hoppyman at (G Hopkinson) ([Leica] Too Many for PAW 19)