Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/05/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] M8 on the way back to NJ
From: glehrer at san.rr.com (Jerry Lehrer)
Date: Mon May 14 19:26:49 2007
References: <000601c79688$4aad52a0$12340b44@GATEWAY>

Jeff,

I hate to tell you this, but your 3.5E Rolleiflex is pre-wired to accept 
the Rollei exposure meter
as an add-on.

I dunno 'bout your M4, but mine has wires leading to the flash terminals.

Jerry


Jeffery Smith wrote:
> I truly appreciate my M4 and Rolleiflex 3.5E now. Not a wire in them.
>
> Jeffery Smith
> New Orleans, LA
> http://www.400tx.com
> http://400tx.blogspot.com/
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org
> [mailto:lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of 
> Slobodan
> Dimitrov
> Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 6:12 PM
> To: Leica Users Group
> Subject: Re: [Leica] M8 on the way back to NJ
>
>
> This is reminiscent of the problems Rollei had when they first went  
> 'electronic'!
> Some dealers told me they almost went bankrupt trying to cover the  
> problems, and calm the tempers of customers.
>
> Slobodan Dimitrov
>
>
>
>
> On May 14, 2007, at 4:05 PM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
>
>   
>> Well, the error-prone M8 is on its way back to NJ. The president
>> (Horn) said
>> that they would send me a new one. Over the past few weeks, I have  
>> been
>> scouring the web for possible fixes. I found one poor fellow whose M8
>> shutter appeared to be tearing vertically, from bottom to top(!).
>>
>> Glad that I don't need to wait for something to return from Solms.
>>
>>
>>     


Replies: Reply from jsmith342 at cox.net (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] M8 on the way back to NJ)
In reply to: Message from jsmith342 at cox.net (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] M8 on the way back to NJ)