Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/05/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Here's a few posts from wandering about this past week and weekend. See all of Page 1 of the following link, photos L1000233 - L1000218. All, I believe, taken with the 35mm 4th version Summicron, B+W 486 IR/UV cut filter. L1000044, 62 and 67 are in-camera JPGs, the rest done with Capture One 3.7.7 (the new one), with the "M8 with generic UV/IR" profile, which seems better than the "M8 IR486 filter" profile <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/pklein/album170> I'm amazed at the M8's ability to capture detail, especially at ISO 160. See the pairs of full-frame shots and 1:1 crops with the word "Detail" in their file names, such as: <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/pklein/album170/L1000233RockGarden-w.jpg.html> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/pklein/album170/L1000233RockGardenDetail.jpg.html> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/pklein/album170/L1000219MarkDShoots-w.jpg.html> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/pklein/album170/L1000219MarkDetail-w.jpg.html> With all its quirks, the M8 gives you both a camera that 's somewhere between medium format and 35mm slide film, and a bit-better equivalent of Tri-X or Fuji Press 800. I know that C*non DSLRs have better image quality at ISO 1600 and up, but the M8 has a decided size and weight advantage, and I've already got lenses. So far, so happy. :-) --Peter