Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/05/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: comments from one of the judges
From: montoid at earthlink.net (Montie)
Date: Sun May 6 06:48:36 2007
References: <200705061053.l46AnbRL038833@server1.waverley.reid.org>

Interesting observation, Walt. For me, it's more a question
of degree of impact one's work has, rather than whether or
not I are one (artist).  ;-)
 
Obviously, there are many more "Pillars" in art than there 
are "Architects".  Some of the artists you mentioned were 
architects responsible for whole movements!  ;-)
 
Montie


>Monti

The Fine Art genre. That  makes all the difference in the world. 
Naturally, had I known we were going to move into such a creative, 
complex and deep subject such as fine art I'd have been more respectful. 
:-)       I will admit, though, to having an early on love affair with 
/*art photography*/ before becoming tainted with journalism. I was 
fortunate enough. to see, handle, and be partially responsible for shows 
by Ansel Adams, Brett and Edward Weston, Minor White, Dave Heath and 
others. They were, as I'm sure you know, the backbone of what came to be 
called art photography.

It now seems as if every Tom, Dick and Honey carrying an overpriced 
camera is into art photography. Either that or heaven forbid, 
photojournalism. Believe me, I've nothing against art. Even been known 
to enter (and win) a few art contests but that wasn't the issue with my 
post concerning our contest. One has only to pick up a copy of Black and 
White magazine to become all to familiar with fine art photography. The 
back twenty-five percent of that bastion of photo art is filled with 
"struggling artists". Mostly, it seems, they  are listed as fine art 
photographers rather than dabblers, dilettantes or just plain wishful 
thinkers.  Psychology, culture, life experience, education and insights 
aside, I was not caught up in a  fine art versus the rest of us 
routine.  What we manage to post on a monthly basis is quite far afield 
from /*art*/. You, me, and ll the rest do o.k., but fine art? I think 
not. Occasionally one of  us may stir the graphics pot and pull out a 
nice image but I'd be remiss if I tried to classify any of us as artists.

One more thing before returning to my state of lethargy and inaction. 
There are plenty of LUGGERS burning up a lot of film (or pixels for our 
less fortunate compatriots) on a constant basis. Rather than 
encouraging  more film to be wasted  I'd hope the contest  causes  us to 
think before we click.  Intent, content and after it's all over, repent. 
:-P

Walt

Replies: Reply from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Re: comments from one of the judges)
Reply from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] Re: comments from one of the judges)