Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/04/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Noctilux M8 question
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Fri Apr 20 12:44:09 2007



On 4/20/07 3:25 PM, "Eric Korenman" <faneuil@gmail.com> typed:

> The whole point of the noctilux IS f/1.0
> So don't worry about back focus issues at f/2.8
> 
> Eric
> 
My point is that I don't.
I don't worry about back focus or any kind of missed or misses focus.

But the Noctilux is not an f1 and be there deal I found out with use.
Its more a f 2000th a second and be there kind of deal.
Using the widest f stop possible.
In other words in a hell of a lot of situations you just have to stop down
or you over expose at 2000th of a second.

And I've used mine extensively at f16 and be there at high noon with the sun
out and they looks great projected as big as your house with Leica glass at
a LHSA meeting.

Point being the lens is usable as a lens. One doesn't need to put ridiculous
constraints on its use which would make it be; Unusable.

Its usable. People use it every day. Some never take it off their cameras.

I didn't take it off mine for a year seems like.

A point could be made that not only would one have to only be using it at f1
but also only in very low light situations. Like night. Street lamps. Dark
alleys. As that's what its optimized for.
But the images it makes in other situations are quite valid. Like day time.
I saw them. I've made them. And others do all the time.

The bit about using them on the Beach with Agfapan 25 I've got mixed
feelings about.



Mark Rabiner
8A/109s
New York, NY

markrabiner.com



In reply to: Message from faneuil at gmail.com (Eric Korenman) ([Leica] Noctilux M8 question)