Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/04/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi Luis, I have the 21 Elmarit pre Asph (purchased used from Bryan Caldwell several years ago - thank you again Bryan) and the 24 Elmarit Asph purchased new from the redoubtable Dr. Yao (thank you Joseph). In use with the M8, in the field, I don't see much difference in their image cutting abilities at middle apertures. I know that may be heresy but that's what I see. With the M8 I lean to using the 24 more than the 21 because with the 24 I don't need a separate view finder. Both lenses at the moment are visiting Solms to be coded. Cheers Howard (still in Tokyo) On 9 Apr 2007, at 6:33 AM, lug-request@leica-users.org wrote > Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 00:24:35 +0200 > From: "Luis Ripoll" <luisripoll@telefonica.net> > Subject: [Leica] 21 & 24 Lenses > To: "'Leica Users Group'" <lug@leica-users.org> > Hi all, > I own a Elmarit M 2,8/21mm (Pre-ASPH), I'm very happy with it, > sometimes is > some slight vigneting on the corners, in my opinion the Super > Angulon R > 4/21mm was better, but I'm no general complaints against the 21mm > Elmarit. > Some days ago has been offered me a Elmarit M 2,8/24mm ASPH, I've > read great > eloges of this lens of a superior quality, but my question are > about your > experiences comparing the use of both lenses, I think that it make > no sense > to have both, the difference is very small. > > Probably the 24 would be a better companion for a 35mm, which I'm a > great > user, and the 21 for the 28 that I use very few. > > Thanks in advance for your comments > > Saludos cordiales > Luis >