Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2007/03/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Photofreek?
From: dlr at dlridings.se (Daniel Ridings)
Date: Thu Mar 29 21:02:19 2007
References: <25EBD8A2-9E03-456F-8EA5-C38976D3A985@mindspring.com> <001701c77258$46837fa0$a302a8c0@ted> <174CF55AE1AFE02E61D81F07@scarborough.isc.org> <4C131B3F-3AB5-4837-813D-EFD33882F017@earthlink.net>
Doug Herr wrote:
> It's my turn to vouch for him. I met a few years ago him near northern
> Illinois and he has valid reasons for wanting to remain anonymous.
>
I think that is perfectly ok for the public group.
I did not, however, appreciate getting an anonymous letter from him
off-list.
Daniel
Replies:
Reply from jmaddox01 at suddenlink.net (Jack Maddox) ([Leica] Photofreek?)
In reply to:
Message from ricc at mindspring.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] Photofreek?)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] Photofreek?)
Message from reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Brian Reid) ([Leica] Photofreek?)
Message from telyt at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) ([Leica] Photofreek?)