Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/03/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: 4/3 cameras
From: ricc at mindspring.com (Ric Carter)
Date: Thu Mar 8 08:27:06 2007
References: <200703081235.l28CZ5Bf032826@server1.waverley.reid.org> <71E4C0B9-8A28-419F-8026-873E6057CDB8@optonline.net>

Didn't we have the same reaction to built-in meters, auto-exposure,  
zoom-lenses, and auto-focus.

'Chrome-heads still look down their noses at negs.

I still ain't sold on auto-focus;^)

We don't change easily.

Ric

PS: Does talk about pictures here dry up every time major new  
equipment is released?


On Mar 8, 2007, at 10:58 AM, Lawrence Zeitlin wrote:

> I hate to admit this but I am old enough to remember when exactly  
> the same argument was used about 35 mm cameras in photojournalism.  
> The film size was too small to stand much cropping. It was slow.  
> There was too much visual noise (grain). Small Leicas and Contaxes  
> would never be competitive with Rolleis and Speed Graphics.  
> Miniature cameras were only suitable for amateurs, not working  
> professionals, etc., etc. Sharpness and even flash lighting were  
> the order of the day, HCB and Capa were criticized for their blurry  
> and grainy images. Baseball pictures were taken with Graflex SLRs.  
> Who cared what the Europeans were doing? Real men carried big cameras.


In reply to: Message from lrzeitlin at optonline.net (Lawrence Zeitlin) ([Leica] Re: 4/3 cameras)