Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/03/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On 3/7/07, Daniel Ridings <dlridings@gmail.com> wrote: > In the US, I don't know if you are allowed to say this, but if you go > to the lower class areas, lower education level, you're going to find > the fat people. > > If you walk up Michigan Avenue where better educated, more well to do > people live, you are not going to see very many fat people. The reason for this is very complex. ONE aspect has to do with what markets in low-income areas choose to carry, and it isn't fruits and vegetables. A pilot program in Sacramento has been undertaken to measure the effect of offering fruits and vegetables (fresh, that is) in very low-income areas. It took effort because the infrastructure for the small markets wasn't in place and there were economic incentives as well. The initial numbers, and this was from last summer as I feebly recall, showed that 1) people would select the fresh foods over others and 2) there was a corresponding increase in population health. I don't recall how that was measured but the results were good enough to get another round of funding. Sorry I can't provide more details and I'm not finding the original reports. There are other issues at play of course: food as a drug is a major one, food as control, food for relief of depression. The cause of obesity is multi-dimensional just as the cause of anorexia is complex. The energy balance part is the EASY part. Behavior is much more complex. It's just as for dealing with drug problems. Adam