[Leica] Blocked emails on .Mac accounts

[hewthompson at mac.com (Hugh Thompson)]

For all .Mac users - hope this settles the matter.  Suggest if it  
happens again, as many as possible send in a complaint immediately.

Hugh

Begin forwarded message:

> Dear Hugh,
>
> I appreciate your concern that you were temporarily not receiving  
> messages from the Leica Users Group (LUG) which sends from  
> 192.147.236.5.
>
> Based on your most recent email, I see that you are now  
> successfully receiving email from the LUG. As for an explanation  
> why this occurred, because the issue affected all .Mac users at the  
> LUG, it is likely that due to a spam complaint or report, the  
> 192.147.236.5 IP address was temporarily blocked by the .Mac Mail  
> servers.
>
> For the inconvenience, I apologize. If this issue should occur in  
> the future, which I hope that it does not, please report it to .Mac  
> Support as soon as possible.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Chris
> .Mac Support
> http://www.apple.com/support/dotmac
> http://www.mac.com/learningcenter
>
> Hello Clarke - re TrackID: 3460407
>
> Here is the problem, you are blocking emails from "leica-users.org"
> at 192.147.236.5, this not only happens to me but also about 40 other
> folks who use .Mac for email.  Although I did fill in the questions
> below you should note that I have no other problems with my .Mac
> email account.  You should understand that I and my associates on the
> Leica Users Group (LUG), are quite familiar with, and many are very
> sophisticated in, working with our Mac computers and software.
>
> What is strange to me is that I complain, and low and behold 75 email
> messages from the LUG are in my inbox.  What I and my 40 other
> friends want is for you to not block any messages at any time from
> "leica-users.org" at 192.147.236.5 - very simple.
>
> Please note that during the time it took me to compose this reply
> another 5 emails arrived from leica-users.org - that tells you
> something about the traffic this group generates, from all over the
> world.
>
> We would appreciate an explanation, and no further interference.
>
> Thank you
>
> Hugh Thompson
>