Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2007/02/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] disturbing ?
From: imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George)
Date: Sun Feb 25 10:45:10 2007
References: <3AEEAA21-1BF2-418E-A7E3-677B6A64ADB8@mac.com> <FC2EF598-EDAB-478E-AFF2-F153680FA85D@pandora.be> <E4A43FC9-762F-4D45-AB8B-309E702E2155@mac.com> <1A7E11D9-588F-433D-BAD4-E1D7601C3E7E@pandora.be> <7E991770-E2FE-4744-8A89-9FDB82FC1801@mac.com> <811CB9BB-B99F-4F1B-BCCC-59CD520D2111@pandora.be>
Certainly an interesting topic. Degrees of staging from simply
bringing a child into the studio for a portrait with a few changes of
their own clothes to paying professional child models to act out
(whatever) in full costume and makeup. Where does one draw the line?
Regards,
George Lottermoser
george@imagist.com
On Feb 24, 2007, at 3:50 PM, Philippe Orlent wrote:
> The fact that I find disturbing is that he's staging children. Esp.
> in his critiques on schmaltz. The Riefenstahl stuff.
> It's Loretta Lux like, but she treat's the children with more
> respect IMO.
Replies:
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] disturbing ?)
Reply from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] disturbing ?)
In reply to:
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] IMG: PAWeek 08)
Message from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] IMG: PAWeek 08)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] IMG: PAWeek 08)
Message from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] IMG: PAWeek 08)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] disturbing ?)
Message from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] disturbing ?)