Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/02/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: The Elusive Digilux 3 (NOT DLlux3)
From: ausdlk at gmail.com (David Keenan)
Date: Sun Feb 18 22:54:59 2007

>better firmware

That's a laugh. The firmware issues of the M8 is pretty strong evidence that
Leica ain't so good at writing code.

Frankly, I doubt that it (the firmware) is any different then what is in the
Lumix. Why would it be? Why would Panasonic agree to market a camera with
"inferior" firmware. Ridiculous.

I have strongly considered buying the Panasonic. And I just might soon
enough -- but I think anyone who likes the idea of this type of camera and
opts for the (much) more expensive Leica version instead is, well, a little
bit daft.

The ONLY reason I see if a preference for chrome over black. If someone
feels that strongly about having a chrome camera then what the hey? But the
lenses are black... Doesn't a complete black kit make more sense -- and flat
out just look better?

Maybe it is brand loyality. Okay, fine. And a three-year warranty. Who
cares? The camera will be obsolete far sooner then that.

Why a chrome version of a camera with a little red dot on it is worth a
$800+ premium over the same camera in black is beyond me.

Maybe the theory of "the camera as jewelry" comes into play yet again...

Dave.

Replies: Reply from rsphotoimages at comcast.net (Bob Shaw) ([Leica] Re: The Elusive Digilux 3 (NOT DLlux3))