Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/02/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]This wedding photographer is perfectly happy printing on Sliver Rag for custom albums and custom prints with the R2400. I've seen pro results from both HP and Canon and do no think they're even close to Epson. Canon reps have been saying for years that they've surpassed Epson, well okay my 4x6 Canon dye sub is better than any 4x6 dye sub Epson printer :) Now if anyone can give me advice on how to sew and bind my own Rag prints into a leather album, I'm all ears. Chris ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Rabiner" Subject: Re: [Leica] Epson 3800 whose GOT THEM?!?!?!?! > What's up is that there is no real give and take back and forth between > Epson printing use and HP. Epson has %99.99 of the market sewn up of > serious > print makers. Printers for fine art. Commercial photographers. HP is years > behind and not just almost starting to catch up. So is Canon who is a bit > in > front of HP. So I don't know who you're talking to it sounds like you're > talking to HP reps. I've never heard of Steven Johnson I now look up up and > see he's building some kind of a cultist digital inkjet empire to put Fred > Picker of Zone VI to shame from a previous age. > > LAST YEAR both HP and Canon both introduced their FIRST pigment inkjet > printers. > LAST YEAR. > 2006 > Its been 2007 now for only a month and a half. > > > I cant talk to wedding photographers maybe they're even using dye sub I've > no care but if you to to a gallery, museum or a studio of a commercial > photographer which a fine art aesthetic; in other words one of the good > ones > you are going to see: > > MATT 100% rag PAPER from the European companies who've been at it doing > pretty much the same thing for 400 years. > PIGMENT INK > EPSON PRINTER. >> > Mark Rabiner