Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/02/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: The TO and CC fields
From: lug at steveunsworth.co.uk (Steve Unsworth)
Date: Thu Feb 15 11:54:14 2007

Well I appear to have sent my original reply to that email address and I'm
waiting for it to appear.

Steve


On 15/2/07 19:45, "Wade Heninger" <heninger@adobe.com> wrote:

> Ok, I'm on the record as liking the reduced traffic.  But I'm not overly
> concerned if we went back to the old way, as I managed to read or delete
> without a problem.
> 
> That said, I'm confused as to how people don't understand if things will 
> get
> thru or not as if its some kind of "black magic" that powers email.
> 
> Just look at the To and CC lines. If "lug@leica-users.org" is there, it 
> will
> get to everyone. If it isn't, it won't.
> 
> It isn't rocket science.  No need to panic or beat yourself in angst with
> your least-used lens.
> 
> And I don't mean to insult anyone here, we're all smart as hell I'm  sure.
> 
> And I can understand not liking the fact that "reply" does not go to the 
> LUG
> automatically - it takes a bit more time to add it there if you deem it
> necessary - but there is something to the theory that maybe that reply
> shouldn't go to the whole group automatically.
> 
> But come on people, its not a black hole of confusion...
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 



In reply to: Message from heninger at adobe.com (Wade Heninger) ([Leica] The TO and CC fields)