Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/02/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re:not entirely OT: the recurrent dilemma
From: leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams)
Date: Mon Feb 12 12:45:56 2007
References: <200702102352.l1ANmRMK070516@server1.waverley.reid.org><45D0A977.8060202@telefonica.net> <EB04E288-322E-4630-8334-B458DE6C894A@pandora.be>
 
It's been a few years, but when the 17-40 first came out, we sent at least 4 
back for adjustments when I worked at a camera store. 
But we all know quality control on anything is not what it used to be.


Chris

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Philippe Orlent"
Subject: Re: [Leica] not entirely OT: the recurrent dilemma


>I read different stories about the 16-35 and the 17-40. Seems that  it's a 
>piece to piece comparison thing.
> Looks like unstable production. Maybe I'd better go for 2 primes in  this 
> range.
> Thanks for the info,
> Philippe
In reply to: Message from FELIXMATURANA at telefonica.net (Félix López de Maturana) ([Leica] not entirely OT: the recurrent dilemma)
Message from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] not entirely OT: the recurrent dilemma)