Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/02/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re:Kodak BW400CN 220 ??
From: leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams)
Date: Sun Feb 11 09:35:49 2007
References: <82c9dd70702110436g67c77f8dv954dfd0d671cc082@mail.gmail.com><003501c74def$9ffd2b40$0a01a8c0@MacPhisto> <45CF4D43.2020309@nathanfoto.com>
 
I checked Calumet's site and there's not even BW400 220 listed. The BW400 
was in the Portra line so I guess that's why it was 
available in 220.

Chris

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Nathan Wajsman"
Subject: Re: [Leica] Kodak BW400CN 220 ??


>I did not even know that the 400CN existed in 220. I have only seen Tri-X 
>in that format. I would really like a chromogenic film in 
>220 (like Chris, to feed the Bronica 645). I just finished scanning a roll 
>of Fuji 400 chromogenic film (120), and it really is so 
>much easier to scan this compared to normal B&W.
>
> Nathan
In reply to: Message from faneuil at gmail.com (Eric Korenman) ([Leica] Kodak BW400CN 220 ??)
Message from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams) ([Leica] Kodak BW400CN 220 ??)
Message from nathan at nathanfoto.com (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Kodak BW400CN 220 ??)