Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/02/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thanks Don..... I think you did a good test. Blank walls are adequate test subjects... Another and slightly better test subject is an outside wall of a brick building on a really overcast day. The overcast will create even illumination, and the brick wall is pretty tonally the same over large areas. Correct me if I am wrong, but there is no way to enter the FL data into the M8 except by the lens ring coding or faking out that system using a magic marker..... So the picture was taken with no correction for light angle of attack on the sensor. However, and this is more theoretical, since I am far removed from owning an M8..... The 21 SA ( in fact all SA lenses, regardless of coverage) have a very deep hourglass shape. That puts the rear of the lens close to the film plane, and the light rays at a very strong angle to the film. Not at all perpendicular. In effect, it should show the most significant vignetting of any lens on a M8, assuming all the stories about angle of attack on digital sensors are correct..... So I will just say that I am confused..... Delighted you are happy with the results...... buying something besides the SA at 21mm would hurt! Frank Filippone I was shooting a pretty blank wall and the vignetting was not noticeable. I assume it is the design of the sensor and the crop factor taking the outer bits out of consideration. On film I could always notice some darkening of the corners. Don