Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/02/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I have used multiple RRS plates on Acratech, Arca Swiss and Kirk ballheads without any problems. The kirk plates are a little thicker and I've heard that they sometimes have problems fitting a RRS clamp-particularly the lever release clamp. Allen ---- Leonard Taupier <len-1@comcast.net> wrote: > George, > I believe the four companies mounts are interchangeable. I have mixed > Wimberly and Kirk but never used RRS. I don't like the L body > brackets. While I leave quick release brackets on a couple of my > bodies when working inside on a tripod, They come off when the camera > hangs from my neck, outside. > > For light weight use: > My preference has been the Velbon PH-273QL ball head which stays > attached to my Manfrotto 3221WN. I have extra quick release plates > for the Velbon. The plates seem just the right size. > > I also piggyback a small Wimberly C-10 clamp to a Velbon plate. I > keep the small Wimberly brackets permanently mounted on my Leica and > Nikon bellows. It may sound kluggy but it works like a champ. > > Len > > > On Feb 1, 2007, at 10:09 AM, Lottermoser George wrote: > > > Thanks for sharing your experience Leonard. Makes perfect sense > > having looked at Wimberly's long lens options. My primary interest > > is in the light weight relatively short focal length quick release > > system components (while keeping in mind the occasional long > > needs). I don't have anything all that heavy (no 300 - 600 2.8's). > > I've been using the big Gitzo (hexagon) quick release system > > (plates on every body and mounts on 4 tripods and the studio stand) > > for ever. Rock solid for view cameras and most anything else. But