Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/09/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Which one? 2.0 or 1.4? Scott McLoughlin wrote: > Any opinions on the LTM Nikkor 50mm lenses? > > Scott > > Don Dory wrote: > >> Luis, >> Oh, I don't think youi have too many 50's. If you like a little >> softer look, >> try using an uncoated Summitar. They are not too expensive and can >> provide >> a lovely look as long as you don't include bright lights in the >> frame. Or, >> pick up a Canon 50mm F1.4. The Canon has a quite wonderful rendition >> especially wider than 5.6. So in your bright landscape perhaps some >> FP4 in >> Rodinal. >> >> Don >> don.dory@gmail.com >> >> >> On 9/17/06, Luis Ripoll <luisripoll@telefonica.net> wrote: >> >>> >>> Thanks Don, >>> >>> The 50 Summilux ASPH is an outstanding lens, maybe for my style too >>> sharp. >>> Additionally we generally have a bright sun and we could appreciate >>> some >>> "softer" contrast. Even so I ask me if I'm doing a mistake holding 3 >>> lenses >>> of 50 (Summicron, Elmar, Summilux from 1965) and additionally the >>> Tri-Elmar! >>> >>> The same thing arrives me with the 35, I have the Summicron (4th) >>> and the >>> Summilux previous to the ASPH...., but I'm really very happy with my >>> lenses. >>> >>> I'm sorry, I not understand SWMBO... >>> >>> I want go to the Airport too and see....... >>> >>> Saludos desde Barcelona >>> Luis >>> >>> - >> > [snip] >