Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/08/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]The first batch that Walt pointed to left me with some of the first impressions which you noted. However, the second batch seem to be much stronger in the areas that you're commenting on. I'd assume that these are coming in on a daily basis (as in fast breaking news) and being edited before publishing on the web. With that in mind I'd hold judgement before making comparisons with classic images that have surfaced as cream-of-crop of other notable war photographers. Regards, George Lottermoser george@imagist.com On Aug 18, 2006, at 1:24 AM, Scott McLoughlin wrote: > But still.... Am I the only one who thinks Anderson's pics fall > short and just aren't very compelling? And with subject matter > like that, what is his excuse?