Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/08/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Don's PAW week 33 Potpouri
From: imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George)
Date: Tue Aug 15 08:46:53 2006
References: <9b678e0608130633h523372d5l9362b767c2626345@mail.gmail.com> <4cfa589b0608141107p4d1cde80h23880d07143adf4c@mail.gmail.com> <9b678e0608141824s28b65b2ft7e18c5b2007d5eb7@mail.gmail.com>
 
Personally - I find the "what" irrelevant. Had we seen that he was  
studying anatomy (or whatever) the specificity may have detracted  
from the universal strength of the "all studies" quality of the  
image. No doubt that if this were part of a photo essay on medical  
students, or a portrait of doctor or intern - the specificity would  
have merit. However, as a stand alone image the universal appeal wins  
in my book.

Regards,
George Lottermoser
george@imagist.com



On Aug 14, 2006, at 8:24 PM, Don Dory wrote:

> I took a good image that would not be great.
In reply to: Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Don's PAW week 33 Potpouri)
Message from abridge at gmail.com (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] Don's PAW week 33 Potpouri)
Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Don's PAW week 33 Potpouri)