Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2006/08/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Interesting 50mm variation (eBay shame?)
From: jhnichols at bellsouth.net (Jim Nichols)
Date: Wed Aug 2 11:01:00 2006
References: <200682114827.038066@NewDellHome><E905BDB6-FF95-45E8-A752-FD4A9A453482@mindspring.com> <2DA7AAAB-70EA-4E1E-A6E0-09851A1B0DAD@pandora.be>
I think that the main objection to naming that auction site in emails is
that it opens them up to "hits" when anyone searches for that site. To
avoid your mail going public, mangle the reference to that website.
Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
In reply to:
Message from ausdlk at swbell.net (David Keenan) ([Leica] Interesting 50mm variation (eBay shame?))
Message from ricc at mindspring.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] Interesting 50mm variation (eBay shame?))
Message from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] Interesting 50mm variation (eBay shame?))