Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/07/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Don: I have a friend with the first of the full frame Canons. Lots of artifacts and noise in low light/high ISO situations. Doesn't hold a candle to my humble DS. Perhaps the new full frames are better? Jim P.S. Pentax has announced a forthcoming 10mp, same chip as Nikon D200. It'll be interesting to see how noise is handled on images from the denser chip. Don Dory wrote: > Jim, > The key word is relatively. Much better than most film but not as good as > the Canon's or the new Nikons and I suspect the new Sony. But heck, at > under $400 what is there to lose? > > > On 7/23/06, Jim Hemenway <Jim@hemenway.com> wrote: > >> >> > relatively poor high ISO performance ???? >> >> I respect your opinion Don, but can't agree with you. >> >> Shot with isDS at 200 and 1600 ISO >> http://www.half-fast.com/Takumar1000 >> >> Shot at 1600 >> http://www.half-fast.com/TavernRoom.jpg >> >> Same chip and software as the DL. >> >> Jim