Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/07/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Here are paintings and an engraving of Constanze. Anyone into forensic facial comparison? Painting: http://www.soundpostonline.com/archive/spring2003/page10.htm Go to the end, then up one paragraph, see engraving and painting: http://www.allabreve.org/mozart-weblog/mow_pages/mow_life_2.html And this link argues that the photo could have been taken in 1840s. http://www.mozartforum.com/VB_forum/showthread.php?p=13632#post13632 I'm skeptical of the whole thing, but it's interesting nonetheless. All this stuff about the photo being taken much later than claimed could be easily resolved by comparing the Swiss composer's image to other likenesses, if they exist, or just by comparing his actual age at the time to the apparent age of the man in the photo. --Peter Luis Miguel Casta?eda <lmc@interlink.es> wrote: > Mozart described her to his father as not beautiful but with a nice > shape. Add 50 years *of that time* and figure what you might get :) On 13/07/2006, at 20:23, Philippe Orlent wrote: >> As I said, she was just too ugly to have been Wolfie's :-)